slacker US "defense" and deficient news media

the united states were attacked near the end of 2001. now in mid 2004 the bootlicker media begin to question the disastrous failure of the US military to fulfill its fabled mission to protect the country. why are the media finally picking up this subject seriously? it’s because government put it on the plate, of course. oh, it’s hot now in june 2004!

i’ll save ranting point-by-point on this. some oldies:

what sort of people could witness what happened and not be pissed off at the ripoff? if a government commission is leading the way, always presume something’s wrong. the liberty people were on it from day one; normalons wait until prompted externally. what does that tell you that you don’t know?

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “slacker US "defense" and deficient news media”

  1. the IDIOT » ‘Surprisingly, no one was fired’ Says:

    [...] send me a complete list of who in the official crime gang was fired for prime state-bonehead exhibit 9/11/2001. then see if you can write that with a straight face. unaccountability is criterion [...]

  2. the IDIOT » asshole bragging about being asshole with assholes Says:

    [...] dipboy talks about “heroes” from the fibbies and the central inelegance aphidry. were those the same fucks living in the 1996 world where for fifteen bucks they could’ve read all about someone flying a 747 into the capitol? that’s what i call on the ball, mothafuckah! great job on 11 september 2001. [...]

Reply form

comments are enabled solely to discourage off-topic blather when i'm writing elsewhere. my wish is that no one comment here.

off topic? say it here or it'll be deleted. no spam. full censorship policy here.

update 20100729: generally, dunce comments from anonymous pussies no longer replied to. comments routed to spam queue may take weeks to publish, and sometimes be deleted accidentally from overlooking during review.

You must be logged in to post a comment.