"libertarian girl", you are so sexy
i confess to being fascinated by “Libertarian Girl“, a numbskull who espouses shallow, leftist dogma under a libertarian umbrella, some of it with libertarian overtones.
she’s very cute. gorgeous, full lips. nice face and eyes. looks fit. she also…
…works for government, most likely federal.
I graduated from college in 2004, and moved to Washington, DC where I work for the government (which sucks for a libertarian).
she’s fresh out of college, hasn’t a damned thing sensible to say about libertarianism (something with which she’s obviously newly and barely acquainted), and yet her blog is a hotbed of comments and attraction.
this post you’re reading, from a dorkbutt, increasingly antisocial guy who can’t find a woman he finds suitable, with a blog that if it weren’t for my friend sunni would rarely have a comment, may be found tempting to write off as jealousy or some unmentionable trait that removes my opinion from consideration. however, some facts before you judge:
- libertarian girl has her head up her ass.
- she’s, one might fairly say, beautiful in appearance.
- she claims to be a libertarian and works directly for government, taking money that was stolen from you and me by force.
- her blog is new, and reflects quite well the characteristics outlined above.
- her blog is very popular.
am i missing something? hell, she posts the most banal entry, saying zippo of import, and the flies come out of the woodwork to fawn (not always excoriate)! are the softballers her friends? does she actually associate with anybody who’s a libertarian?
do not misunderstand me. when i started this blog i knew that it could never be popular. i have done many things on this blog to almost ensure that that’s the case. i am excited when some other people who don’t do what i have done get tons of traffic. seriously.
but could there be a better example of the failure of liberty in this country when a person claiming to be a libertarian starts up a blog, spews untenable crap, works directly for the biggest enemy of liberty in the world, and is not roundly shunned? not all of the comments at her blog spit on her nonsense.
all one may conclude from the published information is that “libertarian girl” pulled her Emergency Karma Shutoff Valve early, and is the rankest of prostitutes.
and she looks good. i, however, would not sleep with her knowing her beliefs. and that’s saying something! so to libertarian girl, the non-sexual whore, i bid a hearty, non-sexual, “fuck you.” may you someday realize the error of your ways so that i may fawn over you too. and wouldn’t that be nice?
[050213 update here]
January 27th, 2005 at 15:50
Ooooh, I’m so jeal- oh wait, you called me your friend. Nevermind. {smooches}You may have noticed, O Perceptive Pig, that I rarely use the L-word. That’s intentional. Calling oneself a libertarian is increasingly fashionable, particularly in public-policy circles, it would seem. Partly as a consequence of that, the term has been watered down, and what most “libertarians” really ought to call themselves is leashitarian.
And secondly, methinkest thou hast been around the blog-block enough times to know what a blogwhore is ….
Snikt! [Sound of Snarky Snake retracting claws]
January 27th, 2005 at 16:07
oh, i’ve noticed lots of things about you, my darling. and you, i would definitely sleep with! in fact, i would go so far as to say that i have definite sausage for you — if that line were not already taken by a better, more successful man.
; )
glad your… claws(?)… have been retracted. skeptical man was spot on with that post, btw. i don’t need to tell ya.
i think i’m turned on envisioning you with fangs. let’s go private. ROFL.
January 27th, 2005 at 16:54
Her name, Libertarian Girl, is only half right. And you already know which half. :)
January 27th, 2005 at 18:34
yes i do, happy. hey, cool blog. just popped it into my bloglines feeds.
January 27th, 2005 at 23:13
LOL! Jimmy Dean ain’t the kind of sausage I like best, Dear Piggy, so there’s still hope for you. I’m not on my primary machine so I can’t move the love-fest off-stage.
FTR, as a constrictor, I don’t have fangs that inject venom … but my teeth are nasty sharp all the same. I’ve been bitten by pythons before — it fucking hurts.
While away this afternoon I thought of an essay I’d written a long time ago that you might like … I’ll try to remember to look for it tomorrow.
Sunni
January 27th, 2005 at 23:52
still hope! very nice. that “go private” comment was simply meant to make anyone reading think there’s more going on between us than really is, BTW, but i think i understand now why i got a non-PGP e from a snakey pig earlier.
hey, i guess you didn’t happen to see my LRC blog post a while back about venomous snakes. this is a hoot. let me get this together here…
i finished this blog post with “…Most of the bite stories have a badge-of-honor tone to them, even when they’ve lost the use of body parts. That’s very cute and all, but since I don’t have pet snakes, nobody else should either.”
so a week after that, lew forwards me an exchange he had with a stranger. here’s the entire first email from the guy:
From: “xx” xx@xx.com
To: Lew Rockwell
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:02 PM
Subject: who made you king?
hmmm since you don’t have snakes as pets, no one else should either. well I guess I could say since I’m not an opinionated bossy little pansy, you shouldn’t be either.so lew wrote back, polite as always, that he didn’t know what the guy was talking about, and did he always write that way to total strangers? the response:
From: xx
To: Lew Rockwell
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: who made you king?
I would be referring to this bit of drivel I stumbled across.
http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/001079.html
and yes when I see something that asinine and close minded, I generally feel the need to comment on it. If you feel the need to make such idiocy public, then expect a few rebuttals.
Oh well, I’ve said my piece.he said his piece, sunni! ROFLMFAO
if he only knew how much the author of that idiocy would like a pet snake right now. mmmmm.
January 27th, 2005 at 23:53
damn these comments! it won’t accept paragraph tags, and if you end a paragraph with one of the few tags it accepts, then it bunches it up. well, you get the idea, i suppose.
January 28th, 2005 at 10:16
Pet snakes can be fun, and very interesting. So far, I’ve had four types (all nonvenomous, because I don’t want to be a Darwin Awards nominee); via friends and family I’ve seen many more types in pet situations. My favorite is ball pythons; they’re beautiful snakes, and also have personality. I’ll stop blathering on now, but if you want more info let me know off-stage. :-)
Sunni Snake
January 28th, 2005 at 10:40
comment space here is unlimited, ma’am, far as i know. you ever run out of room, you just let salty know, and he’ll buy a new server for the overflow.
; )
still loading the ball python page…
no, it turns out i wasn’t. i was constantly refreshing the ball python page! the only substantial html there was a 0 delay refresh of the same page. weird:
META http-equiv=”Refresh” content=”0; URL=”http://ballpython.com/page.php”
a snake snake having personality gets my interest. you have any prior writing on the subject?
January 28th, 2005 at 17:56
No, no commentary on the care and feeding of snakes, with or without personality … maybe I’ll add that to the stories list for some far-distant day when I’m not so buried in projects. I will say that it isn’t PC, but we’ve avoided a lot of feeding difficulties with our snakes by giving them live mice (it’s common to be steered toward buying frozen mousicles, which are then warmed for the snake to consume).
Sunni
February 1st, 2005 at 04:20
heh… I just posted on my blog about the “libertarian” girl, and after reading yours I must say that my post pales in comparison to this one! And to think that I was actually being overly apologetic for my thrashing of her!
Despite that, I feel completely justified in verbally taking her to the woodshed, and this post only reaffirms my feelings on the matter. For that, and for standing up for liberty in general for bashing you, I commend you.
Reading comments from Sunni and a couple of others over the past few others has made ponder whether or not I should continue to refer to myself as a “libertarian critter” on my blog. The problem with removing the word liberartian is that it would also remove any reason to retain the word critter, which can not stand. Hmmm… that’s something I’ll have to think about. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I do have one disagreement though with this post. I don’t think she’s attractive. The Pepto Bismol color scheme of her blog is bad enough, but her pic violates my senses even more.
February 1st, 2005 at 15:14
you’re too kind, brother. kinda bums me out though that you’re thinking of changing your nickname (“libertarian critter”). we lose “libertarian” and we’ll just keep running to other terms that are glommed in disrespect. and of course we don’t want to lose “critter”. i am a libertarian. i don’t mention that usually without piles of caveats, but maybe the caveats are better than inventing new names to replace the stolen one.
i can understand somebody not finding LG’s picture attractive, which is why i tried to throw in some conditions in describing her. that said, if i were to look at the picture and pretend i don’t know anything about her, i would say very positive things. not exactly my type, but… well, enough about that. the sickest part of her site, in my opinion, is the size of the picture. despite having no principles, she knows what she’s doing. it’s also good strategy for her to leave the negative comments. that reminds me, i just about puked when i saw her handle over at the mises blog. the poor, sex-starved liberty boys have to really dig deep to ignore her.
my suggestion for what to call yourself? i dunno, but i’d say “libertarian critter” has a ring to it. give it a spin and see what you think.