wikipedia to the rescue
no anarchist/voluntaryist apologist is doing his duty if he’s not a wikipedia proponent. is there a better example of human cooperation for “the greater good”? and it’s voluntary. gets me excited whenever i see the believable unbelievable process in action.
as i’ve written before, i was a skeptic at first. wikipedia didn’t care though. it’s proving itself, quickly becoming the common reference as other skeptics also melt in the reality. it may eventually knock the “pro” encylopedias out. the message to retain: amateurs (from the latin amator, meaning lover) rule.