One contact Tase to the man’s left shoulder was deployed
what alternate universe do thugs inhabit where they get away with spouting this obfuscatory bullshit masquerading as language?
When officers were only able to place one handcuff on Meyer, Sgt. Eddie King gave the order to use the Taser.“One contact Tase to the man’s left shoulder was deployed,” King said.
you shot him with a fucking taser, asshole.
uniformed goons cling to this layer of insulation via words, as if “deploying” a “contact Tase” means they didn’t do what they did. they also have the top layer of the nuremberg defense, which, despite rampant denunciation by the official criminal syndicate of the US, continues to work very well for those same criminals and their state underlings.
“sir, did you rape that woman?”
“hardly an ideal characterization, your honor. the penis of the defendant was deployed to a vaginal area.”
“and you are the defendant?”
“yes.”
“so you raped her, forcibly inserting your penis inside her.”
“a penis was deployed, judge. nothing more. anyway, the deployment was ordered by my friend jimmy, who was at the bar with us.”
September 21st, 2007 at 13:15
“the buckshot was deployed in, on, or around the suspect’s cranial area, resulting in cranial incapacitation.”
“so what you’re saying is you blew off an unarmed, innocent man’s head?”
“sir, I am saying only what I am saying, which is that buckshot was deployed in, on, or around…”
“you’re not saying a god damn thing.”
didn’t ayn rand cover this subject in Atlas Shrugged? I distinctly remember a section (or two or three…) where rearden is accosted by a gov asshole buyer demanding rearden metal and he tries to sidestep around stating why it is the gov wants his metal and what theyll do if they dont, and rearden repeatedly asks him to just say what he means but the task proves impossible for the drone.
as hilarious but thankfully less lethal (maybe) an example of this bullshit is my retarded urban economics professor. she has been following the issue of “pedicab” licenses in new york city and she was trying to express her worry about what might happen if the licensing system creates a market similar to that of the taxis, where the owners of the licenses leech off most of the revenue, leaving min wage or whatever for the drivers:
“im just worried that, you know, the same thing will happen as did with taxi medallions, and… instead of having these charming young college students driving the pedicabs, maybe they will be replaced by some… minimum wage workers…. who barely speak english…”
LOL. Just say it, bitch, you’re frightened as hell that there’ll be yet more dirty, spanish-speaking mexicans riding the pedicabs instead of “charming young college students.” The woman spends half the class each day trying to dance around logic and simple linguistic construction so as to maintain the false multi-cultural environment we’re all supposed to love so much. can’t just tell it how it is, that might hurt someone’s feelings!
September 21st, 2007 at 14:36
man, is that a subject, the supposedly incidental benign language used to assign positive spin (and therefore relative negatives to the excluded) to a “beautiful” kidnapped girl, blah blah blah (“girl” itself being one). among the loudest who complain of “discrimination” and generalization rest those who do the same routinely, but with claims of supposedly desirable attributes. the onion delivers a worthy sermon on the matter.
September 21st, 2007 at 18:12
If you go over to Beck’s place, search for “Foster” and check in a post labeled “ignore this post” or something like that, you’ll hear the guy describe a similar thing in that case’s records; people avoiding making positive statements by wrapping words around vague, non-substantive facts. Anyone capable of intellectual precision (which is to say, most people) get caught in the question of just what the fuck did he say?