the IDIOT

recommended

remember the old days — before reality hit — when the paulist rallying cry was “the ‘scientific’ polls are inferior to the polls where ron paul wins!”? the complexity of the analysis was bottomless. for months the paulist animals sucked each others’ dicks on that one issue. they’re too stupid or too dishonest to grasp the obvious, which has been explained here plenty. i’ll explain it again, but first this latest piece of related mindless wankery from LRC’s tex macrae (perhaps the crown prince of the LRC RP dummkopf troops):

They want to come home

Posted by Tex MacRae at February 1, 2008 04:38 PM

What else can we conclude when they vote with their wallets for the only candidate who promises to bring them home? From Q4 FEC reports:

Total Military Member Donations to McCain, Romney and Huckabee Donations Combined: 732

Ron Paul Total Military Member Donations: 931

(Research by a Ron Paul Forums member; details below)

I just did a basic search on the FEC’s website which posted 4th quarter campaign donations today. It turns out that from this basic search, Ron Paul is blowing the other candidates away with donations from the military again. I used a basic search by typing either “Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine, and Coast Guard” into the search field and this is what I came up with:

Army:

Ron Paul – 413 donations
McCain – 141 donations
Romney – 72 donations
Huckabee – 42 donations

Navy:

Ron Paul – 242
McCain – 185
Romney – 22
Huckabee – 33

Marines:

Ron Paul – 109
McCain – 67
Romney – 20
Huckabee – 23

Air Force:

Ron Paul – 137
McCain – 69
Romney – 10
Huckabee – 40

Coast Guard:

Ron Paul – 30
McCain – 4
Romney – 1
Huckabee – 3

Total Military Member Donations:

Ron Paul – 931
McCain – 466

Romney – 125
Huckabee – 141

Total Military Member Donations to McCain, Romney and Huckabee Donations Combined: 732

Ron Paul Total Military Member Donations: 931

“What else can we conclude” but that “[t]hey want to come home”? asks macrae. plenty, you insufferable moron. what must ultimately be concluded is that the LRC paulist brigade 1) has no honor, or 2) is less logically adept than the average 9-year-old.

first, who gives a flying fuck, in this context, what some traitor socialist in a milfare uniform thinks? the paulists only point to the scumbag “troops” in this case because they think their baloney point adds weight to the “elect RP” onslaught. it doesn’t — even were the invalidly reached conclusion from the alleged data correct. but past that, to the base illogic:

the RPers regularly lament/croon/chortle that there’s no other candidate like ron paul; they highlight continually that no other major candidate wants to immediately remove US milfare goons from iraq, let alone around the world (where they have no legal — as in US law, not international — business). on that they are correct. however, it fizzles their “What else can we conclude” into dust, and this is where it’s tied precisely to the problem of the inflated RP online polls — self selection.

whatever percentage of milfare pukes comprises gung ho “iraqi liberation” types, with regard to the 2008 US coronation what must that flavor of traitor do to ensure he continues in iraq knocking skulls and “earning” stolen wealth?

nothing. so long as it looks likely that somebody other than ron paul will get the crown, he can save “his” money. it is only the paulists among the milfarists who need lift a finger in the hope of getting out of there without exhibiting manly behavior (i.e., refusing immediately to “serve”). and this goes back a few months to an LRC blog post from a different paulist twat, asserting of the alleged paul milfare donor pinnacle, “given the small amount a soldier makes, this is saying something”.

no, it’s the other way around. if, as alleged, “soldiers” make a small amount, that is strong incentive for those who support non-paul candidates to not waste “their” money, because — according to LRCers — the result of any of those candidates winning would generally be the same. c’mon; it’s the fucking LRC mantra, for christ’s sake.

know what it means if ron paul’s the favored candidate of that fairly miniscule portion of milfare rats who elect to waste their portion of the fedgoon stolen treasure? less than shit. using the true precepts of the LRC crowd, it points to a result opposite of that alleged — again, all based on the fallacy that what those milfare bastards believe means something with regard to the correctness of ron paul’s campaign. what does mean something is the readiness with which the LRC squad plunges into worshiping the data from murderers and betrayers of the US constitution — supposedly the very aspects of skewed US politics that their boy ron paul opposes most strongly. the LRCers are obviously cherry-picking for effect. pathetic they can’t even get that bit straight.

until at least 1) it matters what these milfare scum think of the 2008 election, and 2) all of them must take an equal financial hit to support their preferred candidate (i.e., no self selection), shove the precious data up your ass, LRC hypocrites.

Tags: captain predicto, fallacy, iraq, john mccain, mike huckabee, milfare, ron paul

Posted 20080201 18:41 under derailleur, emperor factory, government dumb, praxeology, up is down, US foreign murder. Follow responses through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are closed.