the missing jury

having recently been “charged with a crime” by an official crime syndicate (its members calling themselves “sheriff’s deputies” and similar filth), i understand the instinct to demand a “jury”. voluntarists, however, may not ethically participate in the enslavement of ostensibly peaceful others, nor should they consider wrongfully coerced decisions valuable.

it’s easy to lose this perspective when threatened with kidnapping by the sanctimonious criminal squad. i have heard arguments opposing my “no standard jury” opinion, but nothing winning. the inability to compose a jury is stronger evidence that the house is on fire — that voluntarists must not suffer the pretense of a “justice system” in the goonited states, nor participate in congratulating such fantasy after a “win”. all “wins” in goon courts are a net loss. a “win” after having encouraged mass enslavement for your liberty cannot erase what you’ve done.

Tags: ,

Reply form

comments are enabled solely to discourage off-topic blather when i'm writing elsewhere. my wish is that no one comment here.

off topic? say it here or it'll be deleted. no spam. full censorship policy here.

update 20100729: generally, dunce comments from anonymous pussies no longer replied to. comments routed to spam queue may take weeks to publish, and sometimes be deleted accidentally from overlooking during review.

You must be logged in to post a comment.