court stenographers and ‘healthcare reform’
while the court stenographers strut habitually the sheen of “objective reporting”, look at this typical article opener (headlined “Massachusetts vote could threaten health reform”):
BOSTON (Reuters) – Voter disenchantment in liberal Massachusetts with President Barack Obama’s policies has turned a Senate election into a nail-biter that could imperil U.S. healthcare reform.
though i disagree with such use, the primary active definition of reform — and its obvious intended political definition — is “improvement through amendment”. here, via duplicitous language killing, the trollops at reuters are asserting that the monstrous illegality and stupidity awaiting the “crucial” vote of the pending official whore from massachusetts is an improvement.
