the dimwit steffy P cantsellya
made a rare exception and clicked into a steffy P blog post. what an idiot:
[...] And many critics point to things [the iPad] doesn’t have. It has no USB. The battery can’t be removed. No multitasking. Well this is silly, in my view. You don’t buy something for what it can’t do but for what it can. [...]
the mark of a true psycho: he begins correctly; yes, you buy not something for what it can’t do. 
this is silly? the critics are noting why they won’t buy an iPad. what it can and can’t do are essentially the same property, unless you’re an “intellectual property” lawyer. sounds like a unicorn tears overdose.
gets better. nearly immediately after the drivel quoted above:
[...] So what is my view of the iPad after getting one? Well, it is gorgeous and well made. It is fun to use. It is useful. But like Apple’s co-founder Steve Wozniak, I was hoping I might be able to use it as a laptop replacement. And I think—probably, it can’t be. The basic reason? It has no (real) keyboard. [...]
laughing out loud at this exalted retard. turns out he — hold your breath — bought an iPad for what it can’t do.
July 21st, 2010 at 14:28
No, from the looks of it (“…I was hoping…”) he bought it for what he was hoping it could do, not for what it can’t do.
July 23rd, 2010 at 13:25
learn to read. my post is correct. slow down and maybe you’ll figure it out. the key is in reading your dumbass comment. you should withhold comment until you get your shit together. and if you get your shit together, you’ll respect my wish that no one comment here.
July 26th, 2010 at 20:38
Ahem, with all due respect, I can assure you my comment is correct.
But I haven’t gathered all my shit yet. I’ll get back to you when I do.
:)
July 27th, 2010 at 15:28
the only correct part of your comment:
from the looks of it (“…I was hoping…”) he bought it for what he was hoping it could do