ministry of information
the clods are eventually going to get what they’re yapping for with this “net neutrality” (bullshit term, of course) scam, and they aren’t going to like it. if you want to find the stupidest, most narcissistic motherfuckers in the room, just poll on so-called net neutrality. those in support of this monstrous property usurpation mark themselves loudly. i avoid writing about it most of the time, because it’s so disgusting how easily people are wooed by this connivance with the odd mix of subtle and brutal. my comment against a typical wanker going off about “monopoly”:
“sticking up for monopoly corporations”? interesting that the so-called federal government is never treated by these economics deficients as the most monopolistic of all corporations, and the only with the wrongly supposed right to — upon the slightest whim of its bestial brain — wave guns in the faces of peaceful folk.
if one is opposed to monopoly, the first sighted for takedown should, sensibly, be the most powerful. there is no alternate, superior species of human occupying this land as our supposed rightful rulers. they are not the fail-safe of child dreams, but rather its opposite. stop appealing to them as children, and stand as a man.
absent voluntary agreement, you do not have the right to force anyone to supply a service to you.* the right is not created from nowhere simply because you joined a mob. written long ago, and nothing’s changed:
What, then, is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense.
if you wouldn’t as an individual pull out a gun and put it to the head of someone offering a type of internet signal for a price, have the bare decency to not clamor for another to do it on your behalf. not enough insulation in the universe to make one right while the other’s so obviously wrong.
* any rothbardian geeks who wander by, i disagree with his assessment of contract scope — especially regarding nonperformance.