copyblight and pretenders

anyone else perplexed and mildly disgusted watching anti-”IP” types regularly invoking the official copyblight word or symbol (©) of the world’s most powerful official crime squad? they’ll even do it in books refuting copyblight. lew rockwell asserts a permission power for articles, attempting to impose conditions on reprinting (“Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.”).

fuck copyblight, fuck “copyleft” — all built on the jackass premise that your control of a work extends beyond your scarce property, into the presses and minds of other individuals. if you understand this, have some balls and conform your vaunted traditional statist insignia and dogma with reality; trash them.

Tags:

Reply form

comments are enabled solely to discourage off-topic blather when i'm writing elsewhere. my wish is that no one comment here.

off topic? say it here or it'll be deleted. no spam. full censorship policy here.

update 20100729: generally, dunce comments from anonymous pussies no longer replied to. comments routed to spam queue may take weeks to publish, and sometimes be deleted accidentally from overlooking during review.

You must be logged in to post a comment.