'Sarah, Charlton. Charlton, Sarah.'
by
Charley Hardman
The
primary occupation of the state is to increase the scope of its
intrusion at every turn. Power naturally increases with scope. Tagging
along for the ride are the private "representatives" of the resulting
factions, whose tough guy tactics are to make sure that the state
hears how upset everybody is.
plink.
That
was the sound of a voting handle being moved. The impact of such
movement on the state tends to be less than that of the sound. But
what a fantastic ride for the front line fighters, huh? I've even
heard that people have made entire careers out of running to Washington
and tendering appeals for mercy from the rulers. There's a word
for them actually, but it escapes me at the moment. What do you
call those people who get prostitutes and clients together? It'll
come to me.
Imagine NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre bolting upright
in a cold sweat one night, his concerned wife hovering over him
as he recounts his nightmare:
"I
was standing outside the DC Hilton back in '81 – you know, where
President Reagan was coming out. He was waving, and I could see
Jim Brady and that Secret Service guy. Reagan's about 20 feet from
the car. He's walking, and I feel so bad seeing him smiling. I'm
the only one who knows what's about to happen. But something isn't
right. The President's waving and smiling, and . . ." Wayne looks
like he's about to break down.
"What
is it, honey? What happened?"
"He
didn't get shot. Nothing happened! John Hinkley wasn't even there.
Reagan just strolled right into that limo, big as all outdoors,
and everybody went about their business – the entourage, the cars,
James Brady. James BRADY, for God's sake! They all just drove away.
It was like they didn't care about me . . . like nobody cared, and
they were all leaving me behind in their big fat limos." His lower
lip sticks out a bit, just enough to be noticed.
She
consoles her husband with a hug, saying, "Aw, sweetie, it's okay.
Maybe we should just go out back for a quick visit to the Sarah
Brady shrine. Let's get your slippers on."
Yeah,
I was a concerned, participating gun owner once. I saw how my "rights
were being taken away" (slave talk). I was a member of NRA, Gun
Owners of America, Tyranny Response Team, and the Libertarian Party.
I had it all worked out. It was a battle, and we all needed to do
our part. Every time those preprinted postcards came in, there I
was folding and ripping, sticking stamps, filling out my return
address six times, and signing my name as the original American
superstar citizen. Then off to the mailbox.
When
I got the appeals from my buddy Wayne for help before the 2000 election,
I dug deep. Out came the checkbook and there went my money. I was
doing something to fight the state. Doing something for me and my
brother and sister gun owners. I even sent money to a pro-gun guy
running for some office in Michigan. Because that's what I was told
would be a good idea. I was once (reaching for the vomit bag) a
generous donor to Fascists "R" Us (freerepublic.com).
To call me a newbie would have been high praise.
But
I wasn't doing anything for gun owners. I was buckling under the
state according to the big plan. And who did I see grinning from
ear to ear and asking for more? NRA, and that golden child of opportunism
(lemons to lemonade, my dear) Sarah Brady – twin towers of reciprocal
back scratching. I laughed when Brady called
me a fool outside the Reagan Building 2 years ago, but was too
naive to understand that she was spot on. Whether she knows why
is another matter. I doubt she's honest enough with herself to allow
that to creep through. Imagine if somebody heard her talking in
her sleep one night, singing praises to Charlton and the crew. No,
the mind must be protected from itself at all costs.
Having
worked at a gun maker for a few years, I knew how one hand washes
the other in the gun business. Did we ever have a bad review of
one of our new guns in the gun press? Does anybody? What a scam.
I'm ashamed it took me as long as it did to figure out. But still,
that was only concerning which arms I bought. When it came to being
"allowed" to buy, keep, and bear arms, the classic spoiler of unintended
consequences could not be ignored any longer. Something didn't feel
right about my dutiful position as a tool in the empire of combating
opinions.
The
turning point for me was Wendy McElroy's essay Why
I Would Not Vote Against Hitler. It was the perfect time for
me to see that argument, and I walked away with the clear decision
that I would never lick another stamp for Washington or its whores
again. Along with my cleared conscience, however, came the realization
that I must be able to meet the state on the real battleground,
not at some pretend stamp-licking festival for freedom.
In
my brief stay at the misnamed Tyranny Response Team, I realized
that most of the tough-talking flag wavers didn't have the nerve
or the sense to stand up to cops even at our demonstrations against
the Million Mom March and the Brady Campaign For Whatever It Is
That Tyrants Do. It was all, "Yes, sir. No, sir." Because we needed
to be political. It was smart tactics. If we didn't play nice with
the cops, they might not allow us to protest.
Whatever.
It's merely a way to justify cowardice. It lets the state's front
line, the physical crew, know that we are their servants, and that
we have a big old wheelbarrow full of respect for them. Why? Let
me know when you figure out a worthy argument. From my side, I'll
not try to improve on the
words of Michael Peirce.
Practicality.
That seems to be a theme for LRC detractors. "Yeah, that's great.
You have great ideas. But what are your suggestions for action?
What do we DO?" This kind tends to see going to the voting booth
as really sticking it to the state.
What
you do is change
your mind and every interaction you have with the state. Do
not accept being spoken to like a slave by those suckling at the
state's breast. Ever. Make them work for every single encroachment.
Do not act as though that taciturn cretin at the Nazi Mobility Registry
(department of motor vehicles) is doing you a favor. Don't allow
them their myth, so essential for their criminal existence. Their
method is as Paul Shaffer once advised David Letterman, "When you're
working with shaky material, sell it, baby. Sell it!" Rather than
feel guilty for their crimes, they go the other direction with a
seedy, "I'll get to you when I get to you." It's effective.
But
getting in faces at Nazi headquarters is just slightly improved
behavior, isn't it? It's still not right. Why were you even in line
at the Nazi Mobility Registry? Why did you pay "your taxes" so that
it could exist? Let's get logical here for a moment (yeah!), and
see how much we really believe in all of our bold talk. Whatever
label you may claim of the paleolibertarian, anarchist, old right,
anarcho-capitalist, Libertarian, libertarian, paleoconservative,
or minarchist mix, we can probably agree to the following inalienable
truths, all of which assume non-aggression on your part:
-
You are your most sacred
property. No human or group of humans has the right to any of
your property except through voluntary exchange.
-
Your rightful
freedom of movement is limited only by encroachment on the property
or prior paths of others.
-
Taxes
are theft – money (property) stolen by threat of force under
the color of authority which is actually nothing but the verdict
of a mob; there is no rightful authority doing the stealing.
-
The state
has no claim to the highways which were paid for with money
stolen from you, often located on property taken from you or
your fellow humans without consent. Stolen property may be possessed
by a thief, but never owned.
-
Being
detained by the state for driving "without license" on highways
stolen from you is criminal aggression.
-
Aggression
may rightfully be opposed.
So
the question is, why are we lining up at a criminal agency to get
permission to drive our cars? Why are we paying criminals for permission
to drive our cars on roads constructed with money stolen from us,
on property stolen from us? Why are we pulling over when the swirling
light circus is seen in the rear view mirror?
Refusal
doesn't exactly contribute to a happy home life though, does it?
I will join brother
White at the witness stand to testify:
Hello.
My name is Charley Hardman, and I am a coward.
Disgraceful.
True. And I am ashamed. More than you may ever guess.
But
defying my natural tendency to throw out the imperfect (me), I must
seek for steady improvement instead. A big step was realizing that
committing scarce resources toward the game of lobbying Washington
is one disgrace which I can eliminate immediately. The rest can
follow. The NRA and Sarah Brady can do their unholy three-way with
the feds where each party benefits except the fools financing it
out of fear and subservience. I must seek to live my life with bravery,
independence, and honor, while admitting that I have not and do
not.
Admittance
is the first step to recovery.
May
17, 2003
Charley Hardman (send him
mail) works with databases in Washington, DC.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
|