An Individual Man
by
Charley Hardman
by Charley Hardman
As we look around us today in bafflement at what the common man allows,
and even what he asserts when pushed to it, let's not forget that
there are men who've been thrown into the sea of stupidity and fought
their way to shore using the confidence of principle. One of the
greatest was Charles Lindbergh, a man most noted for being the first
to fly nonstop from New York to Paris.
It's understandable
that people focus on Lindbergh's 33.5 solo hours in the air that
May in 1927 and consider it the height of bravery and skill. It
was certainly the shining moment which represented the success of
the entire process, and many would scoff at the suggestion that
the physical and mental achievement of the flight itself could perhaps
have been copied successfully by countless others. Examination shows,
however, that Lindbergh's unique bravery and skill was in the getting
there. He basically looked countless fools and poltroons in the
eye and said, "I will do this my way, and I am likely to succeed
because I am right."
Most of the
relevant aviation community ignored or abandoned him early on. Even
with his solid financial backing from some intuitive businessmen
in St. Louis, major aviation vendors refused to sell to him, regardless
of price. Yes, they were interested in having their products (engines,
airframes, oil, etc.) associated with the first nonstop transatlantic
crossing, but they weren't about to let them be linked forever to
a dead "flying fool." They wanted to approve the crew and the plane,
no Mr. Lindbergh necessary or wanted.
A major area
of contention was his opinion that the aircraft have only one engine.
Lindbergh didn't budge, nor did his backers. He insisted that a
single-engine plane made more sense for the crossing. Recognizing
unintended consequences, his subtle reasoning was of a brand we
rarely see outside of liberty circles. Multiple engines required
more fuel, which meant more weight in addition to the extra engine(s).
In the event of an engine failure (at the time, the most touted
reason for having multiple engines), the crippled aircraft would
tend to meet the surface short of land anyway. For little to no
benefit, thousands more dollars would be required for the extra
engine(s), fuel, and associated systems, including a more robust
airframe which itself would require more fuel. With engine reliability
nowhere near today's standard, Mr. Lindbergh was also aware that
multiplying engines multiplied the chance of an engine failure,
the very event multi-engine proponents claimed they were providing
for with the extra engine. As with many proposals made with good
intentions, the disease was preferable to the cure. Lindbergh saw
through the hokum with ease. Had the flight failed it would not
have belied his logic, for he was right. Being called "Lucky Lindy"
must have really stuck in that man's craw.
But there were
some who listened to Logical Lindy – those brave, integral businessmen
from St. Louis, the true Spirit of St. Louis. At a time when critics
were loudly deriding the gawky upstart (an easy shot to take in
comparison to the official, better-funded sorts also competing for
the $25,000
Orteig prize), the core group behind the
project showed faith in its man every step of the way. In his wonderful
book The
Spirit Of St. Louis Lindbergh documented
repeatedly how those men offered money, support, and a total lack
of interference. They advised him, naturally, but always with the
attitude that "Slim" was in charge. As the flight approached they
became more aware that the project's direction could lead to Lindbergh's
death; it was not such lighthearted work as we might assume.
It's tempting
to read history lazily, without appreciating that the history you're
reading wasn't yet made, or its outcome in any way known to the
participants. As Lindbergh readied to leave San Diego for New York
(itself a record breaking flight), it was gradually sinking in that
Nungesser and Coli, two French competitors who'd recently tried
the east-west route from France, were probably lost at sea. His
decision to launch for Paris was marred by worries that his potential
success on the heels of their disappearance would be seen in France
as disrespecting their two aviators. He needn't have worried. Despite
those Frenchies and their cowardly,
freedom-hating hearts, he was greeted warmly
– overly warmly, as you probably know. The world embraces a great
man after his groundwork has been laid in solitude.
Lindbergh's
genius for laying groundwork was perhaps most apparent in his ride
– the majestic Spirit of St. Louis. He worked closely with the crew
at the San Diego based Ryan Airlines Co., brave renegades all, to
put together an aircraft with a single mission. The plane would
mostly be a flying fuel tank.
When it was all argued out, Charles
Lindbergh made the decision to put the main tank in front of the
pilot, and (what the hell?) completely get rid of the windshield!
Back in those days the planes were "taildraggers" with two main
wheels and a tailwheel. That made taxiing an adventure, because
you literally couldn't see in front of the raised nose. And when
landing, you generally had to "slip" the plane cockeyed a bit to
see around the front rather than over it. Is it possible that Mr.
Lindbergh noted those visual limitations and realized that scrapping
the "view" out the front didn't lose him that much compared to what
he gained? A token periscope was installed, but usually bypassed
in favor of the side window. How many people could have made such
decisions so rapidly?
The answer
is "one." There was no committee, no time for showy argument, and
Lindbergh would not have stood for it. The designer, Donald Hall,
may have played devil's advocate for him, but who's going to argue
long with the guy putting his life at risk? To see how Lindbergh
succeeded when so many others failed, return to the principles:
He was right, he knew it, and he was in charge because it was his
life. There is the bravery which so often gets mixed in with
the staying up for 33.5 hours after a sleepless night, on a dangerous
flight where sleep could have meant death. That risk in some ways
mitigates the impressiveness of the task; he quickly realized on
the flight that there was no alternative to success but death and
failure. That's a little more obvious motivation than what it must
have taken to walk once more out of an aviation manufacturer's office,
rejected, and get up the next day to try again. The notable bravery
was in how Lindbergh lived his life. His code of living did not
change upon arrival at Le Bourget Field that amazing night in 1927,
nor anytime after. He remained a steadfast voice for reason in America's
rockiest times, subjecting himself to derision from masses of fools
even after his sainthood.
In preparing
for his historic flight, one of Lindbergh's major tasks was to figure
out how he would navigate across the Atlantic, a body of water with,
not surprisingly, very few landmarks. On casual exposure it's easy
to say, "Navigation. Uh huh." But put yourself in the place of a
man who had no experience on such a long flight, no appreciable
time over an ocean, and no chance that a fancy satellite navigation
gizmo would sneak on board to help him. It was that one man and
the Atlantic, with the likelihood that a significant navigation
error would kill him. A little empathy goes a long way toward appreciating
the gumption it took to propose what he did and make it happen.
Since there
wasn't a transatlantic aviation map store at the time, he bought
shipping charts. Then there was the standard problem of maps not
adequately portraying a sphere on flat paper. Using a map with a
gnomonic projection,
he traced a single, straight line from New York to Paris. Ballparking
the ground speed of his Ryan monoplane at 100 mph, he then broke
the course line into 100-mile segments (one hour apiece), noted
the coordinates, and transferred those segments to his final map,
a large Mercator projection he'd compiled from two maps, which clearly
showed the curved path (with the digital granularity from the 100-mile
points) of the course – a great
circle route. His plan was to change heading,
as necessary, only once per hour. He cut away most everything but
the course line and a respectable buffer, then folded it for portability
in the cockpit. The result when unfolded was a mild, inverted 'V'
of the curved route over the two joined map sections. (Surprisingly,
I couldn't find a picture of this custom map on the Internet.)
By the way,
there's an amusing story in The Spirit of St. Louis regarding
Lindbergh's interaction with the United States Navy after he taught
himself long-range navigation. Good for a knowing chuckle from libertarians.
In early 2001
I went on a solo Lindbergh pilgrimage to St. Louis, Missouri. Following
my normal travel habits, I hadn't called ahead or planned anything.
It happened that the usual museum exhibit was out of commission
in preparation for the 75th anniversary of the flight. On a tip,
I lucked into the library blocks away where much of the Lindbergh
collection was kept in storage. I made my whiny plea, and a wonderful
librarian supplied some stock books of chronological newspaper clippings
of Lindbergh's life (some of them horribly inaccurate, as Lindbergh
often noted with disgust). Thus engrossed, I barely noticed when
she appeared over my shoulder an hour later. "I've brought out something
you may find interesting," she said quietly.
I followed
her to a large table in a corner of the library. Sitting on top
was the one thing I wanted to see – the very map Lindbergh had put
together with such care, and which he'd used in the cockpit of The
Spirit of St. Louis in 1927 to help guide his ship to Paris across
that cold ocean. There was only a thin, movable plastic cover over
the large inverted 'V' shape, probably 5' wide. I stared with awed
disbelief at the physical evidence of the great adventurer's process,
plotted by the man with the confidence to rely on it with his life.
The librarian stood back in silence, patiently letting me take it
all in. I could see Lindbergh's writing, each heading change noted
just as an everyday pilot would write it. I don't know why that
blew me away. I must have figured it would be typeset, or somehow
made official. But it was just Lindbergh's handwritten numbers,
his heart, and his determination, displayed materially for a stranger
74 years later. You could still see the folds he'd made with characteristic
precision, trimmed in the odd shape required by the course line.
Precision was a thing he held almost as dear as life.
Charles Lindbergh
refused the corruption of letting small minds convince him of rot
he knew could not prevail, and was repeatedly rejected by the "leaders"
of his chosen industry. How many of us could withstand such movement
against our solo entry into a field dominated by oppressive bores?
Only Lindbergh the Titan put the winning package together, and his
success is testament to the core truths of liberty and the market
– of the power one agile man can have against a bureaucracy which
walks with glue-covered shoes.
Mr. Lindbergh,
I wish you could have heard my thoughts that day at the library
as I beheld your sure footsteps. You are not forgotten.
June
16, 2003
Charley Hardman (send him
mail) works with databases in Washington, DC.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Charley
Hardman Archives
|