all for me, none for thou

pounding his war drum, US secretary of scoundrelly operations robert gates bleats that "[s]erial numbers and markings on explosives used in Iraq provide 'pretty good' evidence that Iran is providing either weapons or technology for militants there", according to AP. ("pretty good" is the only direct quote from gates in that quote from the article.)

well guess what, retards? i have found incontrovertible evidence that USG has been providing weapons and technology for militants in iraq. more damning, the majority of militants in iraq are US soldiers, there under the direct order of a supposed US president. so let's just cut the bullshit.

here we are back in 2002 again as the press and the idiot public soak up "news" basking in false premises. in 2002 they walked around with their brains on the floor, yapping about how "saddam" had "weapons of mass destruction" (OMG!), never considering that the US have the world's biggest supply of "weapons of mass destruction", with a long, dirty history of deploying them against millions of civilians.

somberly, the average US pigeon will insist that the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of japanese civilians was necessary. every last one of them! had there been one less killed, it would have been unspeakable damage to the "innocent" americans who, of course, had done nothing to initiate war with japan. oh no! ask the average dumbshit american how many japanese non-combatants were killed by american firebombs (i.e., burned or smoked to death). no, that's hopeless; make it easier by simply asking which attacks killed more japanese civilians — US firebombing or US nuking. against the hype, the truth is that far more civilians were slaughtered, intentionally, in US incendiary massacres than via the two atom bombs. massacres? massacres can't be launched from the air, can they? but they're so tidy! (for those in the planes)

US deists are full of shit. in raw numbers, the killings of innocents by those labeled terrorists by the US government and its apologists are a drop compared to civilians killed by the US military. why is this truth shoved into the corner by supposedly moral, rational, objective people? why does all US "news" presume the inherent right of US goons to strip from others something US doctrine considers its birthright? delusion for mental peace. if these truths were confronted, the fabric of US drone life would crumble. and so robert gates intones, as if from a pulpit, that he has evidence linking iran to military action in iraq. MFer, heal yourself.

all of this is built on language distortion, with iran supporting "militants", "insurgents", and "terrorists". USG supports "liberation", "democracy" (ugh!), "self determination" (ha!), and "justice", through "military force". heaven help me, i'm about to shoot a 5-tablespoon load of jiz all over myself.

"operation righteous fury".

oh god, that did it. somebody get me a box of tissues. no, fuck that; gimme a mop.

the iranian government is helping to kill civilians in iraq? apparently, the worst you can say about them is that they are as evil as the US government. let's hear robert gates admit that, and then he can fall on his sword, as all of these sanctimonious child killers should have done years ago.

Labels: deficient press, US foreign murder

posted by saltypig @ 10:29