US simps ready for mulatto president?
mulatto. that's what socialist tyrant barack obama is (barely). and every day the MSM hype the 2008 election based on race, but falsely. AP yesterday: Obama: U.S. Ready for Black Presidentno, the US voting, brutish ignorami aren't ready for a black president. they are mildly comfortable with mixed race, light-skinned vacancies like colin powell, condoleezza rice, and obama. how is calling these three black not repudiation or disavowal of whiteness, something of which all three have more than half in their blood? this is acceptable to the average yummox? of course, because the average yummox is nigh brainless.
find a significant portion of americans with african ancestry who aren't mixed with whites? you can't. look around you. you think the average american calling himself black got lighter skin through the water?
i'll walk through some math. and before i start, i stress that i, alone, couldn't care less what race mix somebody is, except as it might make casual conversation akin to discussing weather. i'm not the one bringing up relentlessly what color barack obama supposedly is. those who are would insist that they're merely "reporting" in light of known biases — a newsworthy item in a place where race matters. however, they bust themselves as personally biased (and stupid) by not even getting his race correct. that's why i'm writing this post, though my preference would be for people to stop talking about race. it's done as though everybody but the talker has a problem. well, those people are racial bigots. me? i'm an accuracy bigot.
say there's a pure white mother and a pure black father. baby comes out. what's he called? calling him white or black is ludicrous. he's pure mulatto — the offspring of alternate color parents.
the average american, being snidely doltish, calls this 50/50 race mix black. the average american (snidely doltish) would call any child of that child black as well. you can have a 75% white, 25% black baby, and that predominately white baby is routinely labeled black. why? well, let's just get right to it: because they consider black blood to be pollution — the genetic equivalent of dirt. add dirt to a bucket of clean water, and you have dirty water. regardless of race, americans overwhelmingly subscribe to the "one drop" theory of white supremacy. in the bizarro world of modern america, those traditionally identifying themselves as black cling to the one drop theory as supposed evidence of racial pride, and it's carried over to disparage, however subtly, whiteness.
i'm not proud of being white. there's no intelligence supporting pride in something one had nothing to do with. however, i also don't want to be insulted or treated as inferior because i'm white, and increasingly, through the legal tender status of the race card, i am insulted. calling mulatto black is an insult to whites. some mulatto wants to adopt stereotypically black social characteristics? fine. doesn't change his appearance or blood line.
most of the racially obsessed people i've met claim that their obsession is directed toward ending racial hate and bigotry. well, if you're racially obsessed, you're a bigot. often these bigots are attempting to fuck over whites through passive-aggressive nitwittery.
wanna be race obsessed? whatever. just get your colors straight, and keep violent force (e.g., democracy) out of your program. oh, and know that you're most likely a psychologically projecting, hypocritical race hater the world would be better rid of.
Labels: deficient press, government dumb, skin whores
posted by saltypig @ 21:59
But Halle Berry, she's BLACK, isn't she? She does proudly carry the torch for "people of color," she'll have you know.
Whatever she is (and let's face it, she's got a LOT of white in her), she looks pretty damn good.
ah, the "people of color" drib drab routine, code for "anybody but whites". i don't have color? fuck if i don't have color. i have more color than most "people of color". pull the same sort of passive-aggressive slam on one of the "people of color" droolers, and you'll have a head-shaking lunatic on site. well, more of a lunatic anyway. we already know how many would react if i called my type "people of clean".
yes, HB is a taste treat when she's not fighting for everybody but whites. too bad she had to fuck away her doo-dad oscar time with "hate speech".
The hypocrisy and political correctness of America is reaching a deafening level. I would however like to point out that in this new age of PC and "progressive" behavior there is still one group of people who can be the target of racism with no controls or misgivings and that is the white male. Far be it for me to say that historically white men haven't had all the benefits, they have, but is this sort of reverse racism plaguing the nation a solution to the problem or just an exasperation of it? Moving from the north to the south I had never experienced this sort of racism before, never been called a cracker or bragged to about how many white women these young African American men can take to bed. Were I black I would be ashamed that women of my race who culturally are religious and sexually conservative, both very admirable traits, are being pushed aside for more promiscuous women of other races. If this is the "new" south, they can have it. If everyone was really interested in ending racism there would be no affirmitive action and there would be no voluntary self-identification. I think the endless complaints coming from the black community over racial inequity are ignoring a far more persecuted group, the Native Americans...who have had no Martin Luther King to stand up for their civil rights which as of late seem to have been squandered.
countless programs to benefit women specifically, and look at the reaction when they find one for men. the answer, of course, is to fuck all these "programs" immediately; kill 'em, and let freedom truly reign (instead of the soviet model clamping around us).
don't agree with you that being religious is an admirable trait. some of the stupidest, most hateful schlmumps i ever met claimed to be devout christians. having been raised in a church parking lot (literally), and spending far too much time in churches up through my teens, i know these vermin better than most. the serial mass murderer bush and his support horde claim to be both religious and conservative. doesn't lend much to either, though of course they're impersonating about as hard as that type ever does. i've mostly discarded the term "conservative" as meaning too many things to have worth anymore. as used now in most cases it means nothing related to conservation.
southerners have generally retained some goodness compared to yankees, though rapidly dwindling. however, my view of the mass southern population is as negative or worse than yours.
wish i knew something good and definite about the raping of the american indians (we're all native americans if born here). multi-generational property transitions can skewer the brain of the best voluntarist. i don't believe they had rights to all the land of this country, but neither did the current rapists (the loudest of which exhibit laughable indignation regarding modern imigration). the indians had rights to life and liberty, both fucked with abandon.
<< Home