cowardice and trade unions
how could one read an average article describing the positions of the writers guild of america and not see in these people raw inferiority and cowardice? it's screaming from the pages.[...] Before today's announcement, I received phone calls and emails from some well-known WGA members, especially feature film writers, angry that the WGA was even contemplating such an agreement while at the same time dumping those issues important to screenwriters like possessory credit, free rewrites and endless meetings without pay. They told me they planned to stop picketing and possibly go Fi-Core [definition] over what they see as a strike that's become more about television that movies. [...]what they're really complaining about, of course, is the willingness of others to put up with conditions they assert are unacceptable. pure busybodyness played off as self respect.
this post isn't going to be a full denunciation of union tactics — scurrilous behavior that somehow gets perverted by the average non-thinker into pure religion. how dare you criticize these people "just trying to do a job"? it always gets back to what socialists don't want to recognize: "greed" cuts both ways. the glorification of unionism relies on the premise that those hiring are greedy for wanting to make the most amount of wealth possible from a transaction, and those being hired are precious for wanting to make the most amount of wealth possible from a transaction.
news for economics morons: everybody wants the most for the least. far from being anything wrong with it, that desire, when tempered by respect for natural rights, drives everything positive in human interaction. call it the yin and yang of interaction, or whatever nonsense you want, they are essential ingredients, and neither should be pissed on when it's combined with its necessary brother. only jealously instigates and allows such rampant disrespect for equal rights. and how many people in american understand human rights? probably under one percent.
you do not have a right to a job. you do not have a right to health care. if those two statements offend you, stop right there and get educated. don't just get pissed and assume your view of the world's correct. demand that it meet scrutiny then triumph or die.
people think the annunciation of this truth is negative or disrespectful. baby, there is no other respectful view on human interaction. it's the only way, because inherent in the view that people have a "right" to health care or any other such commodity is the requirement that somebody else be enslaved to provide this "right" to this special motherfucker — this exception to equal rights. asserting a right to health care is a pro-slavery position.
naturally, the confused don't want to be pummeled by this uncomfortable slaughter awaiting their supposedly empathic and sound instincts, so they conjure up the straw man that anybody opposed to being forced or mob-pressured to do something is therefore opposed to agreeing to or — shocker — initiating helpful action free of any coercion. these types, often wrongly deeming themselves sensitive and helpful, sit back and ignore the achingly obvious truth that shoving things up the asses of others is a disincentive toward positive association with the object shoved up their asses. thus what they seek to encourage, they kill.
jealousy dressed up as virtue. that's what all this cowardly sanctimonious crap's about, from WGA through SAG... on down the line. and how long does it take to get up to speed on the ethics of liberty? apparently, far too long. that's one damned abused word, "rights" — its rape executed for america's new superman class, entitlement whiner pussy: champion of anti-competition and fear. the jealous new superman lives in fear that somebody is willing to do the same for less, more for more, more for less... and that willingness must be thwarted. how? by ganging up with a bunch of other controlling pussies, each of which is unwilling to demand for himself what he thinks the conditions of his employment should be, because he's correctly afraid those demands will push him out of a job. so the huddle squad gets together and decides, en masse, to grow a single pair of balls among the lot of them. there's a plan. only there's no such animal as a group pair of balls.
trade unions exist for only one purpose: to allow the mediocre and worse to be protected from individual scrutiny. why would a superior worker need a union? he doesn't. participation in unions is a bald declaration that the participant is materially inferior to his competition. the deficiency may be "only" spiritual/moral. it remains deficiency disguised as strength.
in this post i've only talked about supposedly non-coercive behavior from unionist scoundrels — the mere beginning of the case against these deficient and immoral people.
Labels: children with pubes, dishonor, up is down
posted by saltypig @ 13:30
<< Home