generally don’t care anymore what the “supreme court” says about jack, but will be paying attention to the increased mess they could launch “ruling” on this one, for it’s a blatant violation of both the commerce and ex post facto clauses of the slimy doc. (more…)
via LvMI, in an article nearly tailor-made for my post on the subject, the boys at the onion do it in style:
[...] “It’s just an illusion,” a wide-eyed Bernanke added as he removed bills from his wallet and slowly spread them out before him. “Just look at it: Meaningless pieces of paper with numbers printed on them. Worthless.”
[...]
A few U.S. banks have remained open, though most teller windows are unmanned due to a lack of interest in transactions involving mere scraps of paper or, worse, decimal points and computer data signifying mere scraps of paper. [...]
the premise of all fedgoon “job creation” (ha!) is money from nowhere. this wealth is never presumed to have been pried from the fingers of productive victims (many of them still unborn), precluding their chosen avenues of true job creation; it merely falls from the skies via large-numbers obfuscatory magic. no victims.
tyrants lulling imbeciles (categorized by reuters in the URL as “type=marketsNews”):
Obama to announce $8 bln funding for high-speed rail
WASHINGTON, Jan 28 (Reuters) – President Barack Obama will announce on Thursday $8 billion in grants to develop the first U.S. high-speed, intercity rail service the White House says will create or save thousands of jobs. (more…)
via LRC, ron paul to rick sanchez:
‘libertarian’ just means you’re a constitutionalist.
wrong again, cult leader. even your ass-licking former(?) employee lew rockwell disagrees with that dreck.
while the court stenographers strut habitually the sheen of “objective reporting”, look at this typical article opener (headlined “Massachusetts vote could threaten health reform”):
BOSTON (Reuters) – Voter disenchantment in liberal Massachusetts with President Barack Obama’s policies has turned a Senate election into a nail-biter that could imperil U.S. healthcare reform.
though i disagree with such use, the primary active definition of reform — and its obvious intended political definition — is “improvement through amendment”. here, via duplicitous language killing, the trollops at reuters are asserting that the monstrous illegality and stupidity awaiting the “crucial” vote of the pending official whore from massachusetts is an improvement.
aw, those darling humanitarian career goons. (more…)
this time it’s brainwashed boy paul galvin, wanking off about “self-government” via the constitution.
Next year the country will go through another census. The people and the states – the creators and on-going sustainers of the federal government – have authorized this undertaking (U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 2). The census should be seen not as a burden but rather as an opportunity for Americans to practice self-government. Let me explain.
anyone who does the show-of-incredulity laugh-off routine when you assert that state kid prisons (AKA “schools”) are indoctrination centers for the official crime syndicate, tell him to shove this embarrassment (jim fedako): (more…)
watch the mises.org fools get spanked. watch the mises.org fools have no rebuttal to their spanking:
[...] It’s certainly tempting to say the states should be bound by the second amendment. But the language was clearly written to limit the federal government. [...]
mark:
Oliva claims “the language [of the Second Amendment] was clearly written to limit the federal government.” Is he reading the same Second Amendment I have in my copy of the Constitution? The First Amendment begins “Congress shall pass no law…”. Clearly, the First Amendment was intended to limit the power of the Federal government. The Second Amendment never limits its restrictions to Congress. [...]
and congress will go where in the US constitution to find this power? (more…)
a lamestream media jackass declares “Courts Unlikely to Strike Down AIG Tax Law, Legal Experts Say“. read the article and search for the words “ex post facto“.
hint: not there.
the prescience of ayn rand and her Atlas Shrugged continues to be certified by “reality”. even the humor of her imaginary headlines shines, fifty years later.
lew’s loose editing style bites another moron:
Did you know that there is no requirement anywhere in the Constitution that a Representative, Senator or the Vice President must swear any oath of any kind? Further, there is no requirement for any Federal judge to swear any oath of any kind.
