the IDIOT

here:

Taxpayers Footing Bill for Tiger’s New Mansion?

Published: Thursday, 2 Sep 2010 | 1:00 PM ET
By: Diana Olick
CNBC Real Estate Reporter
[…] (more…)

reading this article linked from LvMI, it’s almost shocking how infantile is the “mainstream” view of economics in the goonited states. pushing aside the buzzwords, it comes down to this plea:

“please, great demigods calling yourselves the federal government, say something to me. grant me the blessing of your declaration. create economic miracles with your tongues and pens.” [and guns] (more…)

reading, via LRC, the comments to another wacko article from paul krugman, this era’s leading ellsworth toohey, it’s clear that if, as it appears, they represent the american normalon, the spread of communism has passed the point where its inevitability may be questioned. the average american is a goddamned communist.

disheartening to read supposedly sane people referring to the “soundness” of the social security “trust fund” and decrying the characterization of “the program” as a ponzi scheme. logic has never been deader than in the horrid soul remnants of these mobile, violent, breeding fools.

this goonited states variant of communism — IMO worse than what brewed in the USSR — may be traced directly to the socialism inherent in the “anti-communist” actions of the official crime gang throughout the 1900s through today. combining marxism with a traditional american property base leads to almost humorous mental illness. these fucks don’t know what direction they’re pissing in. no principle. no rationality. no peace. nothing but strife. for in their hearts is the seed of traditional property rights, nagging at their recitation of marxist dogma. whence the dogma? WTF. sinister damned process.

big question: was it an unintended consequence? only to the fools who went into sheeple mode. most of the crime bosses knew the score. crime bosses revel no matter what the supposed doctrine bringing them power.

rhetorical hack roger simon:

I am not saying Obama is not smart; he is as smart as a whip.

at a party last year a woman and her husband asserted to me, more as received preface, “obama is super intelligent.”

huh? my ready reply: “name something significant he’s done that evinces superior intelligence.”

::silence::

pretty obvious to the more colorblind that the groupthink postulate of schlobama’s brilliance is racist. what they mean is that he doesn’t talk like a nigger — er, an “N-word” (bleh) — and isn’t that admirable as hell. i’d be hard pressed to place schlobama’s intelligence much above l’emperor bush’s, though his narcissism/sociopathy scores blow the self-absorbed unempathic texas dullard into at least the mesosphere.

smart as a whip? fuck you. you know dick. he’s a blundering psychotic — one about which i was assured by an earnest chimp last year, “he’s more than qualified to run the economy.”

morons, nobody is qualified to “run the economy”. grow a ball. half a ball!

he pretty much nails the dilemma facing all toward-totalitarianism pukes. almost fun watching the morons switch sides to match their crotches.

Private Property Rights and “The Mosque”

Posted by Bill Anderson on August 15, 2010 12:54 PM

Apparently, the lines are drawn with President Obama’s recent declaration of tepid support for the Islamic center to be built near the “Ground Zero” 9-11 site. Many Republicans, obviously, are using this to spread fear and gets votes, but the Democrats easily could debate the GOP on the Republicans’ own intellectual ground, yet it seems that the Dems are incapable of so doing.

What is that argument? It is the simple invocation of private property rights. (No, the Islamic center would NOT qualify as an “externality” under any current definitions.) However, neither Obama nor his fellow Democrats are willing to do that, since “Progressives” believe that private property rights generally are oppressive and must give way to “public interest” arguments. Now that we have a real-live property rights issue, the Democrats are intellectually bankrupt and the Republicans are outright craven. What a choice.

recommended

not a huge fan of jan helfeld, and liberty geeks will see this setup a mile away, but please find me a vid more clarifying than this 2-min clip:

completely destroys the exalted holy foundation of that shit rag the “United States Constitution”. how has it taken hundreds of years for this message to be widely distributed? no more wait, baby.

blackmail is a market transaction. buying silence, tiger woods allegedly ups the payout to his ex. gloria “worthless cunt on wheels” allred greases deals for her clients to remain silent.

why “legal”? only because these deals went through guildists, anointed by the official crime syndicate. how many more of these obvious exposures are required before herbert p. normalon sees there’s no difference between this and any offer to withhold for money the publication of information peaceably obtained?

the “crime” of blackmail is yet another barbaric relic preserved via the disgrace of fools who believe everything they’re told in “higher education” or courtrooms.

“liberty” poster boy thomas sowell is linked at drudge asserting that tyranny’s increasing via useful idiots (insert two layers of quotes there). he then exposes himself as the worst sort of useful idiot, a crime-mob slurper posing as justice advocate.

[...] If our laws and our institutions determine that BP ought to pay $20 billion — or $50 billion or $100 billion — then so be it.

But the Constitution says that private property is not to be confiscated by the government without “due process of law.” [...]

that’s the same dreck ron paul sells via gunman. the rapist has a proper role! he’s merely out of control!

in my 20s and 30s i did that “hey, don’t get me wrong” state-apologist routine while pretending to bitch about the state. figured i was damned late growing out of it. no idea what retardation hits the RP/TS crowd.

retards, the state is not you.

disliked this jackass from the start.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Abby Safe on Board Ile de la Reunion

Abby was safely transferred to the French fishing vessel Ile de la Reunion in the early hours of our morning. Fortunately, the weather had calmed down enough that a dinghy was able to be dispatched for Abby to climb into and to bring her close to the 100′ steel vessel.

We were able to speak to Abby very briefly once the transfer was complete. She sounded tired but good. She had a good sense of humor but was clearly in the early stages of coming to grips with everything.

We don’t have much more info at this time. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s Rescue Coordination Center is working with other ships in the area to determine another transfer to a vessel that will either bring her north of Mauritius to the island of La Reunion or east to Perth, Australia. Either way, it will likely be several weeks before Abby is back home in California.

We would like to give our immeasurable thanks to all of those involved in Abby’s successful rescue. Especially to the authorities, both national and international, that have worked together to successfully conduct this rescue. (more…)

shocked that a “US senator” orates stupidly, and outside the “law” he swore to support?

[...] “What we’ve seen over the past 42 days is, to me, a real dereliction of duty by this administration,” [Republican U.S. Sen. George] LeMieux said in an interview Thursday night. “The president comes down twice for photo ops and then goes back home to go golfing in Chicago.
[...]
“The president is not the legislator in chief, he’s the commander in chief and this is an American problem. It’s not a British Petroleum problem. He needs to be down here getting the best minds, working with them every day on the ground. I expect to see the president three, four times a week in the gulf until this problem is solved.”

referring to a goonited state_ president as “commander in chief” of something other than the military is a foolish and dangerous affectation, reinforcing the modern delusion that he’s emperor of something beyond the GS crime gang (which superior writer robert higgs recently labeled “the liars, thieves, and murderers who style themselves the Government of the United States of America”). “CiC” swilling occupies the same twaddle variant as “running the country”, “leader of the free world”, etc.

constitution is clear enough: (more…)

count on legal guild professionals to get it wrong.

Arizona, it appears, will have to defend its new immigration-enforcement law in federal court.

A coalition of interest groups, including the ACLU, has launched a legal challenge to Arizona’s new immigration law, arguing that it both invites racial profiling and is unconstitutional.
[...]
The Friendly House complaint makes several charges.

One is that immigration is the job of the federal government, and the federal government alone. SB1070 violates the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, the lawyers argue, by setting up a state-level immigration-law and enforcement regime, where immigration is a federal matter. Citizenship verification entails adherence to a complex set of federal statutes, the plaintiffs argue, and this is the federal government’s responsibility, not that of state law enforcers. So when an AZ law enforcer, for instance, is empowered to detain people for the purpose of verifying citizenship, that too is unconstitutional, the complaint argues. [...]

(more…)

as the dude would say, it’s fucking interesting that anyone opposed to the chief narcissist/jackal/occupier is excoriated for even the slightest opposition to opposition of things such as mythical “states’ rights” (state-apologist dodge of individual rights — the only kind) or confederate flags, yet his holiness may without popular detraction refer to a confirmed slaver as an authority on “democracy” (ha!) — democracy, of course, being merely code for mob rule.

[...] Obama argued that from the days of the pioneer politicians who founded the United States, until the modern day, education and knowledge had been the key to progress and US democracy.

He drew a line between Thomas Jefferson, the principal author of the Declaration of Independence, and today’s challenges.

“What Jefferson recognized… that in the long run, their improbable experiment — called America — wouldn’t work if its citizens were uninformed, if its citizens were apathetic, if its citizens checked out, and left democracy to those who didn’t have the best interests of all the people at heart. [...]

nice piece of psycho projection there. big finish: (more…)

normally, people calling themselves libertarian writers/educators completely screw in at least two major ways the beginning of the battle for freedom. not through mere coincidence, these are typically the same fucks yammering about “credibility” and other such generally illogical rot (given undisputed premises, credibility is wholly irrelevant in a logical argument). they’re the same type who right now are thinking, “he just said ‘fucks’”, as if it matters.

line it up, dumbasses. first, fundamental rights (those usually being discussed) cannot be “taken away”. any language to the contrary is simply brainwashed gibberish you’re re-spewing reflexively from an overdose of “good citizen 101″. do not, as jim fedako just did, refer to “additional loss of property rights”. it’s the language equivalent of spreading your legs and begging a rapist to take it easy on you. do not say, “our rights are being clipped one by one” or similar filth.

why? (more…)

may we soon live in a world where, as logic and peace require, the state (i.e., official crime gang) is viewed similarly.