Ron Paul 2012?

Posted by Thomas Woods on March 6, 2010 08:53 AM

Here I figured out a way to ask this question that he couldn’t answer with “it’s too early to say….” [...]

“oh, ron — er, Dr. Paul… cutesy me once again, my lover. deny the core principle i aver. use my wealth to that end. let me man-crush you into history. i will cheer. i will shout your name. show us salvation via the state, as only you can.

[whisper] “bless the coming and going of him.”

[...] A lawyer for Corendon Airlines says the fake pilot had worked for the budget airline company for the last two years and had “expertly misled the company with his false papers”. At other airlines he had managed to pass tests with flying colours.

The lawyer called it pure luck that he had never flown alone and said the fake pilot will never pilot a Corendon Airlines flight again.

the sub headline: ‘A pilot has been arrested at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport for flying passenger planes for 13 years with a false licence.‘

guy must’ve really sucked at it to be caught in a mere 13-year period. he flies all that time without the official crime syndicate catching on, and the mouthpiece of the state (AKA “the fourth estate” ha!) labels him a “fake pilot”. children.

again i attempt to correct the stupid: if the wikipedia article you’re quoting as an authority is properly written, it will list its sources, and those sources (preferably stripped to their origin), at best, are what you should quote. original research is, with only extremely rare exception, prohibited by wikipedia policy.

me, writing the author of a post lew rockwell pointed to as a supposed refutation of helicopter bernanke:

"Even wikipedia".

absent referral to the direct source(s) that any properly written wikipedia article must have for any assertion (thereby bypassing wikipedia, except perhaps to say it's where you found your source), "wikipedia" is essentially a fancy way of saying "someone no one's ever heard of", while pretending it bears great weight.

then, in perspective, "Even [someone you've never heard of]" says blah blah? wow!

it marks you.

[...] When authorities checked Carr’s criminal history, they discovered that he had previously committed a sex offense and was not registered as a sex offender under Indiana state law or the federal statute called the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Carr was clearly in violation of Indiana law, but claims he shouldn’t be subject to punishment under SORNA, a law that went into effect more than a year after he moved to Indiana and three years after committing the sex offense. [...]

will not be surprising if, as usual, the cloaked tyrants rule based on a romper-room lord-schoolmarm assessment of “society”, rather than dispassionate parsing of the “supreme Law” they swore to support. fun to note, again, that “supreme” is not capitalized anywhere in the US constitution.

this in the article (shocker):

[...] Some legal scholars speculate that enacting SORNA was the federal government’s way of usurping power from the states to more harshly punish sex offenders. “The state laws work,” [John Marshall Law School's Corey] Yung says. “For the federal government to take over cases merely because someone passes between states seems wrong. At that point, why even have state criminal laws?” Essentially, the federal government could claim to have jurisdiction over specific issues when individuals cross state lines at any point in their lives. “It’s a genuine threat to the liberty of citizens,” he adds. [...]

sounds familiar:

It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression,… that the germ of dissolution of our Federal Government is in the constitution of the Federal Judiciary–an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped from the States and the government be consolidated into one. To this I am opposed.

(from this guy.)

KABUL—U.S. Special Operations Forces ordered an airstrike that killed at least 27 civilians in southern Afghanistan and the soldiers may not have satisfied rules of engagement designed to avoid the killing of innocents, Afghan and coalition officials said Monday.

The airstrike Sunday hit a group of minibuses in a remote part of the south near the border between Uruzgan and Daykundi provinces. The area is hundreds of miles from Marjah, where the largest allied offensive since 2001 is now in its second week. But the airstrike nonetheless illustrated one of the major problems for coalition forces as they try to win over civilians in Marjah and across Afghanistan: figuring out who is a civilian and who is an insurgent—and not killing the civilians. [...]

outrage? fuggedaboudit. these special terrorists all dress the same and…

shit, i’m forgetting the other essential traits for transforming the deplorable into mere wrist-slappery. team helmets? web site? fuck!

on “insurgent”: when a neocon uses a word

[...] Hunter’s son, Ken Hunter, said he’s alarmed by comments that called the pilot a hero.

“How can you call someone a hero who after he burns down his house, he gets into his plane … and flies it into a building to kill people?” Hunter told ABC.” “My dad Vernon did two tours of duty in Vietnam. My dad’s a hero.” [...]

requisite premise for such insanity: before destroying, get a “permit”. from who? the world’s biggest crime gang.

cavemen had more acuity.

it’s unnecessary. it’s sheeplike. it’s stupid. use the person’s name. get your nose out of the herd’s ass.

death to the useless @ (useful on twitter and in email addresses, of course). and take “hat tip” to the dumpster on your way, with “form factor”, “price point”, wah, wahnk, blahnk, blah.

The announcement of Paul’s win, a surprise victory unlikely to have a major impact on the 2012 presidential contest,

you can hear the vermin praying, “please, god. please make this disturbing fuck go away.”

this is the “objective” press, of course. fuck you all. you’re worthless, dying, and getting funnier daily. this assertion from a ron paul hater, BTW.

so i bowed to the empire and signed up for reader (yet another google thing), while balancing that with basically leaving blogger and — however brief our association — feedburner (an unnecessary product if ever one, from my hack perspective). had never used google reader. it’s far better than the dormant bloglines.

google continues to emerge from its embryo form; embryo of baby skynet. voluntarists, watch your asses with these sanctimonious clowns. damned if i sign up for gmail.