Jury Slacker Ordered To Carry Sign: ‘I Failed To Appear For Jury Duty’

[…] Court officials did not release the man’s name, but the 22-year-old told Judge Thomas Stefaniak Jr. he wasn’t thinking when he left after lunch during jury selection Dec. 5 for the trial of Jeffery Cleary of Valparaiso, the Post-Tribune reports.

“I’ve never been in trouble before,” said the man, who acknowledged he didn’t follow the judge’s instructions during the jury selection process.

“Help me understand what it is about my words, ‘You’ve got to come back,’ that you don’t understand?” Stefaniak said. ”I’m at a loss to understand why you did what you did.” […]

“supreme Law” of the land:
Article. XIII.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

lorne strider on the subject.

In linguistics, productivity is the degree to which native speakers use a particular grammatical process, especially in word formation. Since use to produce novel (new, non-established) structures is the clearest proof of usage of a grammatical process, the evidence most often appealed to as establishing productivity is the appearance of novel forms of the type the process leads one to expect, and many people would limit the definition offered above to exclude use of a grammatical process that does not result in a novel structure. […]

ahhh!

minor premise
present and former paid transnational rapists support jimmy doowah overwhelmingly.

conclusion
therefore, you now have superior evidence supporting the major premise above.

via drudge flash (temporary link only, so not included):

[…] Kroft’s interview with Barack Obama will be broadcast on 60 MINUTES, Sunday Dec. 11 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network. […]

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: […] I’m in the job of putting in place the tools that allow the economy to thrive and Americans to succeed. […]

hannibal lecter was saner, less harmful/delusional/devious than that blundering sociopathic mass-murdering market-destroyer skin whore buffoon. what an ass. and damn all the cock-slurping lemmings who shoved that diseased rat lackey into our lives. makes GB II look like a goddamn truth-spewing savant.

unmodified, my prior accurate skewering of such topical rat dung:

[…] first, who gives a flying fuck, in this context, what some traitor socialist in a milfare uniform thinks? the paulists only point to the scumbag “troops” in this case because they think their baloney point adds weight to the “elect RP” onslaught. it doesn’t — even were the invalidly reached conclusion from the alleged data correct. but past that, to the base illogic:

the RPers regularly lament/croon/chortle that there’s no other candidate like ron paul; they highlight continually that no other major candidate wants to immediately remove US milfare goons from iraq, let alone around the world (where they have no legal — as in US law, not international — business). on that they are correct. however, it fizzles their “What else can we conclude” into dust, and this is where it’s tied precisely to the problem of the inflated RP online polls — self selection.

whatever percentage of milfare pukes comprises gung ho “iraqi liberation” types, with regard to the 2008 US coronation what must that flavor of traitor do to ensure he continues in iraq knocking skulls and “earning” stolen wealth?

nothing. so long as it looks likely that somebody other than ron paul will get the crown, he can save “his” money. it is only the paulists among the milfarists who need lift a finger in the hope of getting out of there without exhibiting manly behavior (i.e., refusing immediately to “serve”). and this goes back a few months to an LRC blog post from a different paulist twat, asserting of the alleged paul milfare donor pinnacle, “given the small amount a soldier makes, this is saying something”.

no, it’s the other way around. if, as alleged, “soldiers” make a small amount, that is strong incentive for those who support non-paul candidates to not waste “their” money, because — according to LRCers — the result of any of those candidates winning would generally be the same. c’mon; it’s the fucking LRC mantra, for christ’s sake.

know what it means if ron paul’s the favored candidate of that fairly miniscule portion of milfare rats who elect to waste their portion of the fedgoon stolen treasure? less than shit. […]

standard quackery from ‘snews companies. one cannot buy back something he never owned. this psyop routine apparently came from the credulous parroting of state criminals and their gun “buyback” tyranny core, which presumes that the state, and peripherally private sanctimonious self promoters, own all, originally and fundamentally. they are all your lords by force.

[…] Jobs said Google was guilty of "grand theft" when HTC released an Android phone that borrowed or approximated many of the iPhone's popular features. Apple promptly sued Google, in one of the early shots of the ongoing mobile patent wars. "I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong," Jobs told his biographer in an "expletive laced rant." "I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this." When former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who also served as an Apple board member from 2006 to 2009 before quitting due to conflict of interest, tried to settle the lawsuit, Jobs told him, "I don't want your money. If you offer me $5 billion, I won't want it. I've got plenty of money. I want you to stop using our ideas in Android, that's all I want." […]

all blowhard arbitrary cunts: if you didn’t make it from the scratchiest of scratch, you used the ideas of others. if you don’t want others to use your ideas, methods, intellectual creations, etc., don’t expose them. copying is not theft. and if you want to be credited for intellectual creations, announce credibly that you piss on copyblight, and hold to that. then you can bitch out others if they portray as from them creations uniquely yours.

the core of material progress is the copying, not the taking, of others’ intellectual creations. what delirious mimicry then to adopt (not invent) the chimeric concept “intellectual property” to push against others in a display of transgressed moppetry, using in the wail’s very delivery the accumulation of billions of intellectual creations not yours.

catch the finish:

[…] Though the legendary early PC, released in 1977, was praised for its clean aesthetic, it was originally going to look much different, and far more complicated, with a Plexiglass cover, roll-top door, and metal straps. While Jobs was shopping in a department store, a Cuisinart food processor caught his eye, and he decided he wanted the computer's case to be made of molded plastic instead.

precious.

[…] St. Johns county Commissioner Mark Miner issued this statement on the issue:

“The Casa Monica Hotel and Kessler Enterprise certainly have the legal right to forbid their employees from wearing an American flag pin. However, their inability to discern between the flag of our nation and other pins and buttons that their policies forbid is of great concern to me. St. Johns County is home to nearly 20,000 military veterans and is made up of an ideologically and culturally diverse population whose collective love for the United States is second to none. I want to make clear that the actions taken by the Casa Monica Hotel and Kessler Enterprise do not represent the patriotism shared by St. Johns County residents and businesses.” […]

oh, and sieg heil, y’all.

note the “fourth estate” swallowing of the propaganda name for invasion and occupation by zee vaterlahnd:

[…] Miner is a two-time veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom […]

plehhhh. note also that the god “ideologically and culturally diverse” apparently does not include opposition to mark “the tool” miner’s dogma. standard behavior from language and human killers.

huh? not what lew rockwell the pronouncer pronounced:

Is Sarah Running?

Posted by Lew Rockwell on September 13, 2010 07:48 AM

Of course, she is, as Ewen MacAskill’s excellent article in the Guardian shows. And what a deal for the regime: a candidate who seems to be an independent but is entirely in the establishment’s pocket, and whose patron is Bill Kristol. Bill, chief neocon since his father Irving’s death, is an advocate of the total state and total war. Sarah will be the means by which he enforces his imperial foreign agenda and domestic police state, and tricks the tax victims. And while the president tends to be just a political button on the lapel of the oligarchy, the White House does mean many billions for her followers and family.

hmm. what to call mitt romney next? terrorist? more accurate than most language kill.